rfc9710v4.txt   rfc9710.txt 
skipping to change at line 105 skipping to change at line 105
9. IANA Considerations 9. IANA Considerations
10. References 10. References
10.1. Normative References 10.1. Normative References
10.2. Informative References 10.2. Informative References
Acknowledgments Acknowledgments
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
When the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) was When the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) was
considering [RFC9565], which updates [RFC7125], the WG realized that considering [RFC9565], which obsoletes [RFC7125], the WG realized
some parts of the IANA "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities" that some parts of the IANA "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
registry [IANA-IPFIX] were not up to date. This document updates the Entities" registry [IANA-IPFIX] were not up to date. This document
IANA registry and brings some consistency among the entries of the updates the IANA registry and brings some consistency among the
registry. entries of the registry.
As discussed with IANA during the development of [RFC9487], the As discussed with IANA during the development of [RFC9487], the
"Additional Information" entry in [IANA-IPFIX] should contain a link "Additional Information" entry in [IANA-IPFIX] should contain a link
to an existing registry, when applicable, as opposed to having: to an existing registry, when applicable, as opposed to having:
* A link to an existing registry in the "Description" entry. * A link to an existing registry in the "Description" entry.
* The registry detailed values repeated in the "Description" entry. * The registry detailed values repeated in the "Description" entry.
This practice has the drawback that the description must be This practice has the drawback that the description must be
updated each time the registry is updated. updated each time the registry is updated.
skipping to change at line 811 skipping to change at line 811
There is a broad variety of possible parameters that could be used There is a broad variety of possible parameters that could be used
for Property Match Filtering (5) but currently there are no agreed for Property Match Filtering (5) but currently there are no agreed
parameters specified. parameters specified.
Additional Information: See the "Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Parameters" Additional Information: See the "Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Parameters"
registry [https://www.iana.org/assignments/psamp-parameters]. registry [https://www.iana.org/assignments/psamp-parameters].
6.12. informationElementDataType 6.12. informationElementDataType
Note that the "informationElementDataType” registry has been renamed Note that the "informationElementDataType" registry has been renamed
as the "IPFIX Information Element Data Types” registry. as the "IPFIX Information Element Data Types" registry.
6.12.1. OLD 6.12.1. OLD
Description: A description of the abstract data type of an IPFIX Description: A description of the abstract data type of an IPFIX
information element. These are taken from the abstract data types information element. These are taken from the abstract data types
defined in section 3.1 of the IPFIX Information Model [RFC5102]; defined in section 3.1 of the IPFIX Information Model [RFC5102];
see that section for more information on the types described in see that section for more information on the types described in
the [informationElementDataType] subregistry. These types are the [informationElementDataType] subregistry. These types are
registered in the IANA IPFIX Information Element Data Type registered in the IANA IPFIX Information Element Data Type
subregistry. This subregistry is intended to assign numbers for subregistry. This subregistry is intended to assign numbers for
skipping to change at line 885 skipping to change at line 885
The "IPFIX Information Element Semantics" registry is intended to The "IPFIX Information Element Semantics" registry is intended to
assign numbers for semantics names, not to provide a mechanism for assign numbers for semantics names, not to provide a mechanism for
adding semantics to the IPFIX Protocol; as such, modifications adding semantics to the IPFIX Protocol; as such, modifications
require Standards Action [RFC8126]. require Standards Action [RFC8126].
Additional Information: See the "IPFIX Information Element Additional Information: See the "IPFIX Information Element
Semantics" registry [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix]. Semantics" registry [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix].
6.14. informationElementUnits 6.14. informationElementUnits
Note that the "informationElementsUnits” registry has been renamed as Note that the "informationElementsUnits" registry has been renamed as
the "IPFIX Information Element Units” registry. the "IPFIX Information Element Units" registry.
6.14.1. OLD 6.14.1. OLD
Description: A description of the units of an IPFIX Information Description: A description of the units of an IPFIX Information
Element. These correspond to the units implicitly defined in the Element. These correspond to the units implicitly defined in the
Information Element definitions in section 5 of the IPFIX Information Element definitions in section 5 of the IPFIX
Information Model [RFC5102]; see that section for more information Information Model [RFC5102]; see that section for more information
on the types described in the informationElementsUnits on the types described in the informationElementsUnits
subregistry. This field may take the values in Table 3 below; the subregistry. This field may take the values in Table 3 below; the
special value 0x00 (none) is used to note that the field is special value 0x00 (none) is used to note that the field is
 End of changes. 3 change blocks. 
9 lines changed or deleted 9 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48.