Interpreter Notes


==== Thread suspension and GC points ====

The interpreter is expected to use a safe-point mechanism to allow thread
suspension for garbage collection and the debugger.  This typically
means an explicit check of the thread-suspend flag on backward branches
(including self-branches on certain instructions), exception throws,
and method returns.  The interpreter must also be prepared to switch in
and out of the "debug" interpreter at these points.

There are other ways for a thread to be stopped when a GC happens, notably:

 - object allocation (either while executing an instruction that performs
   allocation, or indirectly by allocating an exception when something
   goes wrong)
 - transitions to native code or indefinite wait (e.g. monitor-enter)

(A debugger can in theory cause the interpreter to advance one instruction
at a time, but since that only happens in the "debug" interpreter it's not
necessary for authors of platform-specific code to worry about it.)

For the most part the implementation does not need to worry about these
things, but they matter when considering the contents of Dalvik's virtual
registers for "precise" garbage collection.  So, all opcode handlers must
follow this rule:

 * Do not modify the contents of a virtual register before executing
   code that can pause the thread.

This should be fairly hard to violate given the nature of essentially all
instructions, which will compute a result and then finish by storing that
result into the specified destination register.  Using a virtual register
to hold a partial or temporary result is not allowed.  Virtual registers
must not be modified if we abort the instruction with an exception.


==== Method results and GC ====

The return value from a method is held in local storage (on the native
stack for the portable interpreter, and in glue->retval for asm).  It's not
accessible to a GC.  In practice this isn't a problem, because if the
following instruction is not a "move-result" then the result is ignored,
and none of the move-result* instructions are GC points.

(This is potentially an issue when debugging, since we can theoretically
single-step by individual bytecodes, but in practice we always step by
source lines and move-result is grouped with the method invoke.)

This suggests a rule:

 * Don't do anything that can cause a GC in the invoke-* handler after
   a method returns successfully.

Unsuccessful returns, such as a native method call that returns with an
exception pending, are not interesting because the return value is ignored.

If it's not possible to obey this rule, then we need to track the value
used in a return-object instruction for a brief period.  The easiest way
to accomplish this is to store it in the interpreted stack where the GC
can find it, and use a live-precise GC to ignore the value.

The "trackref" functions can also be used, but they add overhead to method
calls returning objects, and ensuring that we stop tracking the reference
when it's no longer needed can be awkward.

Any solution must work correctly when returning into or returning from native
code.  JNI handles returns from interp->native by adding the value to the
local references table, but returns from native->interp are simply stored
in the usual "retval".

