public abstract class BaseTransactionalDataRegionAdapter extends BaseRegionAdapter implements TransactionalDataRegion
| Modifier and Type | Field and Description |
|---|---|
protected CacheDataDescription |
metadata |
settings, underlyingCache| Modifier | Constructor and Description |
|---|---|
protected |
BaseTransactionalDataRegionAdapter(Cache underlyingCache,
Settings settings,
CacheDataDescription metadata) |
| Modifier and Type | Method and Description |
|---|---|
CacheDataDescription |
getCacheDataDescription() |
boolean |
isTransactionAware()
Is the underlying cache implementation aware of (and "participating in")
ongoing JTA transactions?
Regions which report that they are transaction-aware are considered
"synchronous", in that we assume we can immediately (i.e.
|
clear, contains, destroy, getElementCountInMemory, getElementCountOnDisk, getName, getSizeInMemory, getTimeout, nextTimestamp, toMapclone, equals, finalize, getClass, hashCode, notify, notifyAll, toString, wait, wait, waitcontains, destroy, getElementCountInMemory, getElementCountOnDisk, getName, getSizeInMemory, getTimeout, nextTimestamp, toMapprotected final CacheDataDescription metadata
protected BaseTransactionalDataRegionAdapter(Cache underlyingCache, Settings settings, CacheDataDescription metadata)
public boolean isTransactionAware()
TransactionalDataRegionisTransactionAware in interface TransactionalDataRegionpublic CacheDataDescription getCacheDataDescription()
getCacheDataDescription in interface TransactionalDataRegionCopyright © 2002-2017 Red Hat Middleware, LLC. All Rights Reserved